Did you even bother to read what he wrote? Calling someone a fool, asking him if he is " talking the talk and walking the walk".......
He said the answers were CAMTS for gods sake.......How freaking laughable is that idea........Let's pick an organization who self-invented, has no regulatory authority, has no oversight, and make their own rules.......Sounds a lot like Mitt Romney's campaign theme......We all know how well that worked out for Romney / Rove et al........
It was disrespectful to make so many assumptions........and make the statements he did......I think surviving a horrific helicopter crash is more than walking the walk in my book.......The fact Mike still contributes here says it all!
We can agree to disagree now and save the tit for tat, since we rarely agree on anything.
Granted he did apologize in advance, however, he could have just not made the assumptions in the first place.
I wouldn't have felt compelled to interject, had I not read what was written. And while I may not agree with everything in his post, there was nothing that appeared to me to be directed towards MSDELTA as a personal insult. Therefore, again, nothing that requires "a huge apology".
There was something along the lines of "you are a fool IF....", but that came across to me as a general statement and not directed towards MSDELTA specifically.....it was actually verbiage very similar to what you frequently use in your posts when you are "just telling us like it is".
And John, onearm certainly isn't the only one on this forum who makes assumptions from time to time....
But we all thank you for taking on the role of Arbiter of What Constitutes Requiring an Apology on Flightweb (AWCRAF).