Flightmed archive for August-2003
FlightWeb Links
----------------------
Flightmed archive for August-2003



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: High Risk OB dilemna



 I absolutely agree with Pam. When we used to fly a BO-105, our program
policy stated that NO high-risk OB patients were to be flown in the 105. I
would certainly characterise a 26 week GA pre-term labor primigravida with
10cm of dilation and bulging membranes as high-risk. We did have the luxury
of having a BK-117 as our second ship, so we had alternate options.
However, even in the event that the BK was unavailable, I would not
transport any high-risk OB patient in our 105 - there's just no way to
access both patients while in flight. Another issue is the replacement of
my regular partner with an untrained/unfamiliar partner who is not a flight
nurse. Granted, L & D nurses have invaluable experience in their arena of
expertise, but as they would be unfamiliar with both the aircraft
environment and the medical equipment/bags, they probably would be less
help than someone who is familiar with both. We fly second-year ED
residents as an optional part of their ED residency training, and while
there is no denying that they have more training than a flight nurse with
one year of experience, I would much rather have a one year flight nurse
than the resident.

Kevin Bleasdale RN
Flight Nurse
UC Davis Medical Center
Life Flight Program


_______________________________________________
Flightmed mailing list
To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed


[ Home | Archive | Classifieds | Links | Resources | White Pages ]
line picture
© 2000 -- Website created by Rollie Parrish | Credits | Last modified: 08/04/03