Flightmed archive for August-2003
FlightWeb Links
----------------------
Flightmed archive for August-2003



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

USA Today



Having read the articles and seen / heard many comments from the EMS community, both here and through other venues, I am astonished to see such a "knee jerk" reaction from my peers in all areas of EMS.   Lets be honest, EMS is far from perfect.  I mean no disrespect in that, it's just the truth.  I know that everyone in EMS has answered a calling to help their fellow man and we all try to do the best with what we have to work with, but it's time we accept our short comings and utilize this current situation to educate the lay public about the reality of EMS.  What is the reality of EMS?  We are widely under funded, under paid, and we have limited standardization of care from place to place.  For far to long the lay public has had the unrealistic view of EMS they derived from "Rescue 911". 
 
How will the public deal with the fact that a lifesaving drug or procedure may be available in town "A" but in town "B" 10 miles away it is not available even though the EMS systems of both towns are ALS providers?  This question has not yet been brought into the spotlight but it is coming, along with a host of other hard to answer questions.  How are we going to respond?  Across the nation paramedics are fighting for professional acceptance, seeking licensure over certification, mandatory degree programs etc. etc..  It is my humble opinion that the number one sign of professionalism is to take responsibility for a short coming and try to correct it.  Shifting the blame to "reporters twisting the facts" or some other excuse is an act of a politician, not a professional.
 

[ Home | Archive | Classifieds | Links | Resources | White Pages ]
line picture
© 2000 -- Website created by Rollie Parrish | Credits | Last modified: 08/02/03