Flightmed archive for May-2003

Flightmed archive for May-2003
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Is the Time Really Now ?"
All,
A few thoughts... forgive the disjointing of ideas... on shift today.
First, AirWolfMedic I used your subject line, not disrepectfully, but to
provoke further discussion or at least reflection by the appropiate readers of
this thread.
I dreaded reading once again the RN vs Medic bash that I anticipated that would
come from this thread. From my surprise it didn't appear to be the SOS but
rather an excellent articulation of ideas. Mr. Brosius, reno316, Ms. Stover-
Wall among others have posted excellent or thought provoking ideas. Enough on
that point. All of which to a very large extent I subscribe to.
To the idea of 150 years of tradition, I'm sorry to say that exists everywhere
within EMS and Fire/EMS in different degrees. There is a body of resistance to
positive changes in EMS / CCT in alot of the areas of the country. The new DOT
Paramedic curriculum has met with comments of adversion from those who don't
see the need for "ambulance drivers" to get the education that most likely is
best done in the junior college environs to do the Paramedic's job in the 21st
century. A hospital or training center based paramedic education is less costly
on time and money to those localities who require paramedics and must also
provide their training per at least one fire chief who spoke to me on the
subject. How many paramedic have read EMS in 2010?
By de facto I consider paramedicine as a profession but one of the requirements
of a profession is there is an accepted body of knowledge by those who practice
that profession. EMT - * are not there yet. Can we be, sure, three to five
years at best if it was mandated by law today. Another troublesome point is the
fact that how can we "police" members of our profession? Less than optimal care
is found in all areas of medicine but sometimes the purveyors of such care lose
the ability to practice as regulated by their state boards of professional
practice. To fund a state board of paramedicine would require licensing fees -
would you be willing to part with $ 40.00 - $ 100.00 every two or so years to
support those activities. As an example lets consider and contrast the practice
of the AAS(ADN) Nurse to a Paramedic. ( Paramedics with a degree - if that's a
requirement for your cert in your state - let me know privately - overlook my
example)
ADN requires a two year degree from a approved school (most all cases a junior
college at least.)by the regulatory board of nursing of that state. Well, for
the paramedic, to sit for the "final test" that simply varies greatly depending
upon the state in question. Once the appropiate requirements have been met and
fees paid, the ADN sits for the NCLEX-RN (a national test) and if the testee's
grades met the state boards standards a license to practice is granted. For the
paramedic there is a ray of hope here - the National Registry test. Does your
area require this ? maybe, maybe not. The point here is that your state
government controls whatever practice you have. That one place to start. I
don't really mean your EMS regulatory agency alone. They really have no mandate
to make a radical change. Now maybe your elected officials are the place to go
for change. I would not without some solid knowledge and reasons. Having EMS on
board would be better still. One may also gain some insight here if they where
to read the trials and tribulations of the first 100 years of nursing - in the
form of a history of the nursing profession - I know I saw some parallels when
I was forced as part of my nursing program to read it.
As it has been said by other authors to this thread, the difference between
Paramedicine and Nursing is apples and oranges. It is period. But they do
overlap. To those who believe that they end at the airdoors of the ED, your
wrong. It is a continuum of care that begins with the onset of illness and
injury to it's logical endpoint such as cure or rehab. All in a collabrative
team. Those in each of their chosen medical professions who profess this and
leave their other collegues on the wayside should be reminded, educated or
dismissed if the two forementioned items are unsuccessful. You know there are
those in all endeavours who refuse to learn from atop their ivory towers of
isolation with, in their minds, their advanced education and or advanced
experience. "Ah, changes is never good, long live the status quo".
Simple economic fact: So long as the supply exceeds demand cost are low. For
Paramedics, so long as EMT-A, EMT-I or other paramedics at a lower salary level
can provide the "same" service(care) at a lower cost then salary's will remain
where they are. This is true in ambulance services or ERs where you are
employed as techs. I mean this in the context another skill level can
substitute.
The reason nurses are commanding the salary, is the health care system beyond
the streets is totally dependent upon them. Let no nurses ( or can not recuit
enought to staff) a unit not come to work for several days and watch how fast a
medical center scrambles. Laws, standards of care, JCAHO and Medicare get
involved here. Don't forget John Q Public has a overall positive mental image
of Nurses. This is strong moxie for the Nurses to get greater pay.
Lets focus for a moment on a common ground that Paramedics know. ED Nurses -
Those big bucks, sign on bonuses, etc. come with reasons for those benefits.
Usually difficult working conditions, huge workloads, low appreciation from
hospital / unit administration to name a few reasons. I am aware that those
sign on bonuses are in proportion to the degree of undesireability of
employment in each case. Paramedics who do ambulance runs for a whole shift
back to back, no nature or food breaks and complete your charting after your
shift ends know what I'm talking about and are brothers and sisters in the same
trench as these nurses. Moving on, a huge difference that drives pay is also
the power of the ANA, ENA and JCAHO. Alike power base or demand for paramedics
just doesn't exist.(as of yet)
In the email that stated in Maryland you can attend a course to become a CNA
after some further education that's simply a slap in the face. I suspect a
local "expert" who had little current education or understanding of EMS is the
center of this. There are several states where a paramedic can attend a local
one year program and sit for the NCLEX-RNin order to learn the difference of
knowledge the beginning RN requires.(The same standard should apply to RNs also
and does in many states but no all). Those localities show a bit more
intelligence and or understanding of the Nurse and Paramedic professions than
that exhibited by aforementioned post.
The time for change might be now but a consensus between leaders and leadership
organizations of EMS with the support of the other medical professions is
tantamount. Are we as group (profession) ready to do the work, endure the
hardships and cheerfully do the other difficult and or other unsavory tasks
that will needed and expected along this path?
If you are count me in. Otherwise, stop with the bellyaching and put your
talents in educating our peers outside this forum.
Jim Kendrick RN, NREMT-P, FP-C
_______________________________________________
Flightmed mailing list
To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
[ Home |
Archive |
Classifieds |
Links |
Resources |
White Pages ]

© 2000 -- Website created by
Rollie Parrish |
Credits |
Last modified: 05/05/03