Flightmed archive for November-2002
FlightWeb Links
----------------------
Flightmed archive for November-2002



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: twin vs. single



Twin do seem to have more power most of the time. Bell 407 is a great single engine AC. Lots of power, even with a full bag of gas, large patients, etc. Facilities feel better usually with twin engines because statisticly twins look safer. The stats are there, but I cannot remember exactly, that twins "seem" to have more incidents. That doesn't mean that twins give you a false sense of safety, there's just more to go wrong with them. They are expensive to buy and to maintain. Careflight put down a Augusta A109 with a hard landing today. A109's are great AC, and Careflight is a great program, it's just proof that anyone can have problems. By the way, I hear everyone was fine, thank God.

Whatever you fly, fly safe.

God's speed.

 DPEMS500@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 11/5/02 2:09:13 AM Central Standard Time, scrappyfltnurse@yahoo.com writes:


Looking for feed back from flight teams that are operating single engines and considering going to twins... What is the motivation?
Also, programs operatins twin engines and considering going to singles....What is the motivation?
Are Twin engines safer?



We opted for twin engines because of power.  The ships that had the muscle we wanted were medium twins (we fly BK's now).

As for safety...it would seem intuitive that twins are safer, but there is no data to support that.  Statistically, there is no difference in crash rates between singles and twins.

David

David Phillips, BS, LP
Director of Prehospital Services
Scott and White Hospital
2401 South 31st Street
Temple, Texas  76508
voice 254.724.5631
fax 254.724.8237



Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive medley & videos from Greatest Hits CD

[ Home | Archive | Classifieds | Links | Resources | White Pages ]
line picture
© 2000 -- Website created by Rollie Parrish | Credits | Last modified: 11/18/02