![]() |
Send Flightmed mailing list submissions to flightmed@flightweb.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to flightmed-request@flightweb.com You can reach the person managing the list at flightmed-admin@flightweb.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Flightmed digest..."
Today's Topics: 1. RE:I-STAT (Carriere, Brian) 2. Scenario (Ken Lawson-Williams) 3. Re:Scenario (Sam Thurmond) 4. The MRL Pic is Garbage - those looking for new monitors be warned! (flightmedicmike@cox.net) 5. RE:The MRL Pic is Garbage - those looking for new monitors be warned! (David Summers) 6. Re:The MRL Pic is Garbage - those looking for new monitors be warned! (Jean Cragg) 7. Re:Scenario (mike) 8. RE:Posting Confusion (Michael Cox) 9. RE:i-STAT (Pickett, Debra L.) 10. Turn-Key operations (mvojtko@juno.com) 11. Re:Scenario (Barbara Dunham) 12. RE:Scenario (Dr. John L. Meade) 13. Re:Re:RE: Pic Of Zoll Mount (Mike Scott) 14. Re:Scenario (Lisa Heinz) 15. Re:Scenario (Linda J. Wise) 16. (no subject) (Bob Johnson) 17. RE:(no subject) (sgram0529@cs.com) 18. Re:(no subject) (Ronald Bolen) 19. Re:(no subject) (Tom Waters) 20. RE:Scenario (Slemp, Andrew A.) 21. Re:(no subject) (Ken Lawson-Williams) 22. Re:Scenario (Deb Milliner) 23. Re: (no subject) (Deb Milliner) 24. Re:Scenario (susan nittinger) 25. (no subject) (Ted6016@aol.com) 26. Re: (no subject) (Jeremy Hawk) 27. Trauma team activation (Randy L'Heureux) 28. Re:(no subject) (Robert Humphreys) 29. Re:Trauma team activation (Ted6016@aol.com) 30. Re:(no subject) (Barbara Dunham) 31. Re:Scenario (Jeff Brosius) 32. Re:Trauma team activation (Jeff Brosius) 33. Re:Hiring Logistics of Flight Programs (Michael Getz) 34. Re:Trauma team activation (DavidT8525@aol.com) 35. Re:(no subject) (KReninger@aol.com) 36. RE:(no subject) (Terry Foutch) 37. RE:(no subject) (David Pilkenton) 38. Re:Hiring Logistics of Flight Programs (mikeshuken@mail.value.net)
- From: "Carriere, Brian" <bcarrier@provak.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:43:29 -0900
We use them extensively for longer flights. Limited utility for scene calls. We have problems with temperature extremes. -----Original Message----- From: Campbell, Don [mailto:CampbeDK@sutterhealth.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:36 PM To: Flightmed (E-mail) Subject: i-STAT I know several providers are using the i-STAT at hospitals/clinics for IFT's. Anyone using the i-STAT during actual transport on scene flights? Any problems/challenges with this device? Is it easy to use? Our average flight time is < 20 minutes. It's a little hard to imagine doing this at night in a Twin Star w/ light restrictions. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks - DC _______________________________________________ Flightmed mailing list To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed This message is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message.
- From: Ken Lawson-Williams <Macgyver@FlightMedicMail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:08:38 -0800 (PST)
More information - this time evacuation related +++++ It is now a further two days on. A call back to your company has come up blank. You are about twenty miles from the neighbouring state which is undergoing a break down in peace talks at the moment. Rebel troops are known to be armed with ground to air infantry portable missiles and airspace is now no-fly for civilian aircraft. They can send you a team by road, two days, but will not allow transport from site until after expert advice has been given. A doctor from the World Health Organisation and can also bring extra supplies to base. An adivosry has been received that all precautions must be used and patients will be under full isolation until otherwise directed. Patient 1: Fever, visible rash, constant headache, has passed blood in faeces, blood shot eyes, vomiting, diarhhea and GI pain Patient 2: Fever, has not left bed in the last day, totally lethargic, has had two tonic-clonic seizures, eyes are red, continuous epistaxis Patient 3: Fever, complains of itching, headache continues, diarhhea and occassional vomitting. Patient 4: Mild fever, rash is disappearing, nausea. With the arrival of the man from the WHO, you have the opportunity for further supplies and equipment. What would you like? Over to you. Good luck, +++++ This (fortunately) is something we do not have to deal with over here yet. I do not envy the author of this scenario if this has any connection to their workplace environment!! Fly Safe. Ken L-W CCEMT-P/WMT Duct tape is like the force, it has a light side and a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
- From: Sam Thurmond <thurmond@cfl.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:30:52 -0500
Possibly dengue fever or dengue hemorrhagic fever - if it is then fluid replacement therapy and acetaminophen (no aspirin). Could also be Ebola, Marberg, typhoid or a malarial fever. In any case, don't share their water glasses!! At 01:08 PM 10/30/2002 -0800, you wrote: >More information - this time evacuation related > >+++++ > >It is now a further two days on. A call back to your company has come up >blank. You are about twenty miles from the neighbouring state which is >undergoing a break down in peace talks at the moment. Rebel troops are >known to be armed with ground to air infantry portable missiles >and airspace is now no-fly for civilian aircraft. > >They can send you a team by road, two days, but will not allow transport >from site until after expert advice has been given. A doctor from the >World Health Organisation and can also bring extra supplies to base. An >adivosry has been received that all precautions must be used and patients >will be under full isolation until otherwise directed. > >Patient 1: Fever, visible rash, constant headache, has passed blood in >faeces, blood shot eyes, vomiting, diarhhea and GI pain >Patient 2: Fever, has not left bed in the last day, totally lethargic, has >had two tonic-clonic seizures, eyes are red, continuous epistaxis >Patient 3: Fever, complains of itching, headache continues, diarhhea and >occassional vomitting. >Patient 4: Mild fever, rash is disappearing, nausea. > >With the arrival of the man from the WHO, you have the opportunity for >further supplies and equipment. What would you like? > >Over to you. Good luck, > >+++++ > >This (fortunately) is something we do not have to deal with over here yet. >I do not envy the author of this scenario if this has any connection to >their workplace environment!! > >Fly Safe. >Ken L-W CCEMT-P/WMT > >Duct tape is like the force, it has a light side and a dark side, and it >holds the universe together. > >_______________________________________________ >Flightmed mailing list >To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to >http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed Sam Thurmond thurmond@cfl.rr.com
- From: <flightmedicmike@cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:48:24 -0500
The MRL Pic is the biggest piece of shit ever created to monitor a patient. It looks good, and its cheap, but the modules independantly fail, there was no invasive line software to run the 2 ports on the unit for three years, I am not sure if they ever finished that or not. The batteries last about 30 minutes with a cycling pressure, sometimes less. The support respresentatives know little if anything about the product they sell, and the overall support is terrible. I would highly recommend you reconsider the Zoll CCT M-series or the Physio Lifepack 12. Both more reputable companies that obviously know what they are doing. Michael Getz, NREMT-P Flight Paramedic Med Air One
- From: "David Summers" <copterrn@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:06:16 -0500
flightmedicmike@cox.net Subject: The MRL Pic is Garbage - those looking for new monitors be warned! The MRL Pic is the biggest piece of s&^Q#% ever created to monitor a patient. Michael Getz, NREMT-P _______________________________________________ Michael, Lets keep this list rated "G". Tact and diplomacy will get you more respect. Obviously, you have had negative experiences with the MRL Pic. Your opinion is heard. Now perhaps the manufacturer will contact you for some product improvement consultations! Play Safe David Summers RN, etc. Jupiter FL
- From: "Jean Cragg" <Jean.Cragg@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:56:02 -0000
David, Well said, thank you. Jean SR Para ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Summers" <copterrn@bellsouth.net> To: <flightmed@flightweb.com> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:06 AM Subject: RE: The MRL Pic is Garbage - those looking for new monitors be warned! > > > flightmedicmike@cox.net > Subject: The MRL Pic is Garbage - those looking for new monitors be > warned! > > > The MRL Pic is the biggest piece of s&^Q#% ever created to monitor a > patient. > > Michael Getz, NREMT-P > > > _______________________________________________ > > Michael, > > Lets keep this list rated "G". Tact and diplomacy will get you more > respect. > Obviously, you have had negative experiences with the MRL Pic. Your opinion > is heard. Now perhaps the manufacturer will contact you for some product > improvement consultations! > > Play Safe > David Summers RN, etc. > Jupiter FL > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightmed mailing list > To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed >
- From: mike <mikey49@concentric.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:03:48 -0800
>From day one (first posting) these patients warranted full isolation precautions. Anyone not already exposed should stay away unless absolutely essential for their care. Transport would be inappropriate due to potential spread of the disease to the crew and other contacts along the way. Treat these patients and their contacts at the location they are at. Items requested from WHO.1. IV solutions, colloids and associated supplies. 2. Gowns, gloves, masks basic sanitation supplies. 3. Chlorine bleach. 4. A good ,preferably secure communication system with a competent health care facility ,if it doesn't already exist. 5. perhaps an i-stat. 6. Blood specimen containers. Viral and bacterial culture specimen supplies. The problem here is not having a good diagnosis. Send out blood work (ELISA) and cultures as best you can. Treat symptomatically until DX is made. Assume the worst (one of the hemorragic fevers) and post quarantine signs to keep others out. Prayer would be useful too. Thanks for making us think about this type of problem. Mike Earnheart, R.N. Sam Thurmond wrote: > Possibly dengue fever or dengue hemorrhagic fever - if it is then fluid > replacement therapy and acetaminophen (no aspirin). > > Could also be Ebola, Marberg, typhoid or a malarial fever. > > In any case, don't share their water glasses!! > > At 01:08 PM 10/30/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >More information - this time evacuation related > > > >+++++ > > > >It is now a further two days on. A call back to your company has come up > >blank. You are about twenty miles from the neighbouring state which is > >undergoing a break down in peace talks at the moment. Rebel troops are > >known to be armed with ground to air infantry portable missiles > >and airspace is now no-fly for civilian aircraft. > > > >They can send you a team by road, two days, but will not allow transport > >from site until after expert advice has been given. A doctor from the > >World Health Organisation and can also bring extra supplies to base. An > >adivosry has been received that all precautions must be used and patients > >will be under full isolation until otherwise directed. > > > >Patient 1: Fever, visible rash, constant headache, has passed blood in > >faeces, blood shot eyes, vomiting, diarhhea and GI pain > >Patient 2: Fever, has not left bed in the last day, totally lethargic, has > >had two tonic-clonic seizures, eyes are red, continuous epistaxis > >Patient 3: Fever, complains of itching, headache continues, diarhhea and > >occassional vomitting. > >Patient 4: Mild fever, rash is disappearing, nausea. > > > >With the arrival of the man from the WHO, you have the opportunity for > >further supplies and equipment. What would you like? > > > >Over to you. Good luck, > > > >+++++ > > > >This (fortunately) is something we do not have to deal with over here yet. > >I do not envy the author of this scenario if this has any connection to > >their workplace environment!! > > > >Fly Safe. > >Ken L-W CCEMT-P/WMT > > > >Duct tape is like the force, it has a light side and a dark side, and it > >holds the universe together. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Flightmed mailing list > >To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to > >http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed > > Sam Thurmond > thurmond@cfl.rr.com > > _______________________________________________ > Flightmed mailing list > To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
- From: Michael Cox <michael@seaox.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:52:08 -0500
After several backchanneled inquiries some clarification is in order: No "flightmedicmike@cox.net" IS NOT Mike Cox. Thanks, Michael Cox michael@seaox.com
- From: "Pickett, Debra L." <DPickett@mc.utmck.edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:19:00 -0500
We use it on scene and IF flights. The only problems that we have had is the machine is very temperature sensitive. It can not be left on the aircraft during non transport times. Debbie Pickett, R.N., C.E.N. Chief Flight Nurse UT Lifestar Aeromedical Services Phone: (865) 544-8992 Fax: (865) 544-8868 E-mail: dpickett@mc.utmck.edu
- From: mvojtko@juno.com
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 00:38:55 GMT
Can you folks out there in cyberspace help? Our program is in the process of negotiating a turn-key takeover of our program with our aircraft vendor in an attempt to head off an administrative proposal that will be our program's end (and force the entire flight staff to look elsewhere, lose tenure, be absorbed into the system, etc.). Essentially, our hospital wants to relieve themselves of the financial responsibility of our current aircraft and it's maintenance. Here's some of the info we need: 1. Where did you start? We have been in dialogue with our current vendor and they are gonna bite on the deal. Perhaps others in the group will have that little bit of information that we haven't considered. 2. Did you turn the program over completely, or did you maintain medical control and turn over the aircraft operations only? If you maintained medical control and medical staff, what problems did you encounter and how did you go about establishing medical control with your vendor? 3. What problems did you encounter? Feel free to elaborate. 4. How did you prepare your presentation to administration? Again, we're looking for those missing puzzle pieces. Any and all information is greatly appreciated. Mark Mark Vojtko,RN,BSN,CCRN Inova AirCare
- From: "Barbara Dunham" <rotormed77@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:57:04 -0600
Okay, Here's a question for the group - how many of you have prayed during treatment/transport of critically ill/injured patients? And if you have, do you credit the prayer with making "the difference"? (This is in reference to the comment that "Prayer would be useful too".) Thanks in advance to any replies! Feel free to answer privately, if you prefer. Barb Dunham rotormed77@hotmail.com "Remote for detachment, narrow for chosen company, winding for leisure, lonely for contemplation, the Trail leads not merely north and south, but upward to the body, mind, and soul of man." - Harold Allen, The Appalachian Trail Conference _________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
- From: "Dr. John L. Meade" <jmeade@statdoc.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 21:05:44 -0600
Barbara, Interesting question!! I am often struck by the fact that I can sometimes pull some odd trick out of my hat, or perform some difficult procedure with apparent ease, in the midst of a crisis. I have no illusions that it is because I am far superior to every other doctor on Earth. I know that I often have some help from God. God obviously works through us to save lives, and a prayer for guidance now and again is not wrong. In my opinion. JM John L. Meade, MD, FACEP Emergency Medicine Specialist Emerald Healthcare Group, P.A. http://www.statdoc.com/ Try not. Do! Or do not. There is no try!--Yoda, Return of the Jedi. -----Original Message----- From: flightmed-admin@flightweb.com [mailto:flightmed-admin@flightweb.com] On Behalf Of Barbara Dunham Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 20:57 To: flightmed@flightweb.com Subject: Re: Scenario Okay, Here's a question for the group - how many of you have prayed during treatment/transport of critically ill/injured patients? And if you have, do you credit the prayer with making "the difference"? (This is in reference to the comment that "Prayer would be useful too".) Thanks in advance to any replies! Feel free to answer privately, if you prefer. Barb Dunham rotormed77@hotmail.com "Remote for detachment, narrow for chosen company, winding for leisure, lonely for contemplation, the Trail leads not merely north and south, but upward to the body, mind, and soul of man." - Harold Allen, The Appalachian Trail Conference _________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp _______________________________________________ Flightmed mailing list To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
- From: Mike Scott <smikesct@swbell.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 00:29:36 -0600
Hey Ron, FYI: Metro Aviation is the company that does our EMS conversion man. Mike Scott, RN CFN MAF
- From: Lisa Heinz <flytrn117@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 06:41:44 -0800 (PST)
yes, i have and i am not ashamed of giving credit where it is due!
Barbara Dunham <rotormed77@hotmail.com> wrote:
Okay, Here's a question for the group - how many of you have prayed during
treatment/transport of critically ill/injured patients? And if you have, do
you credit the prayer with making "the difference"?
(This is in reference to the comment that "Prayer would be useful too".)
Thanks in advance to any replies! Feel free to answer privately, if you
prefer.
Barb Dunham
rotormed77@hotmail.com
"Remote for detachment, narrow for chosen company, winding for leisure,
lonely for contemplation, the Trail leads not merely north and south, but
upward to the body, mind, and soul of man."
- Harold Allen, The Appalachian Trail Conference
_________________________________________________________________
Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband.
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
_______________________________________________
Flightmed mailing list
To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
- From: "Linda J. Wise" <lwise@mail.mcg.edu>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 12:12:39 -0500
absolutely!!
>>> flytrn117@yahoo.com 11/01/02 09:41AM >>>
yes, i have and i am not ashamed of giving credit where it is due!
Barbara Dunham <rotormed77@hotmail.com> wrote:
Okay, Here's a question for the group - how many of you have prayed during
treatment/transport of critically ill/injured patients? And if you have, do
you credit the prayer with making "the difference"?
(This is in reference to the comment that "Prayer would be useful too".)
Thanks in advance to any replies! Feel free to answer privately, if you
prefer.
Barb Dunham
rotormed77@hotmail.com
"Remote for detachment, narrow for chosen company, winding for leisure,
lonely for contemplation, the Trail leads not merely north and south, but
upward to the body, mind, and soul of man."
- Harold Allen, The Appalachian Trail Conference
_________________________________________________________________
Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband.
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
_______________________________________________
Flightmed mailing list
To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
- From: "Bob Johnson" <scoobymedic@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 13:12:27 -0500
A ? for the group, Does any flight services have any rules about spouses ( Nurse/medic )flying together as full time partners. _________________________________________________________________ Get faster connections-- switch toMSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
- From: sgram0529@cs.com
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 13:48:42 -0500
Our company has an unwritten policy that doesn't allow family members to fly on the same aircraft together due to the fact that if there were a crash (god forbid), there would be 2 losses in the same family instead of one and if there were children involved........imagine the tragedy. My husband and I both are flight nurses for the same company and due to scheduling issues our crews may fly nurse/nurse occasionally. However, we do not work together on the same aircraft. We, along with management, both agree that it is definantly in our best interest not to fly together nor sign narcotics together. Most of these "guidelines" have been initiated by my husband and I due to the fact that it is not a common situation and we want to protect ourselves. You could see how a jury, or even a supervisor, could look at a husband/wife team who had a bad outcome with a patient and wonder if there were any issues that were not revealed because they were trying to protect each other. I can't say that I wouldn't think the same way in the their shoes. As I said before, this is not a written policy for our company, but I would definantly recommend that you not fly together for liability reasons. Fly safely! Serena Gramling Native Air "Bob Johnson" <scoobymedic@hotmail.com> wrote: >A ? for the group, Does any flight services have any rules about spouses ( >Nurse/medic )flying together as full time partners. > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Get faster connections-- switch toMSN Internet Access! >http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp > > >_______________________________________________ >Flightmed mailing list >To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed > >
- From: "Ronald Bolen" <bolen001@mc.duke.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:07:35 -0500
You are not allowed to be on the same crew, but no problems working at the same base.
- From: "Tom Waters" <tom@tomwaters.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:03:18 -0700
Here at Wyoming Life Flight, we have 3 sets of husband/wife. 2 are both-medic and 1 is medic/nurse. As with most, no written policies exist, but couples do not fly or go ground for that matter, together. It is usually only at shift change that the 2 medic teams are ever even seen together, as there is kid-turnover and one parent goes home. I have worked several places air and ground, and whether written or un, couples do not supervise/work toghether, this includes when the pilot may be involved with a medical crew member. That happens too, occasionally too. Good weekend all... Tom Waters ----- Original Message ----- From: <sgram0529@cs.com> To: <flightmed@flightweb.com> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:48 AM Subject: RE: (no subject) > Our company has an unwritten policy that doesn't allow family members to fly on the same aircraft together due to the fact that if there were a crash (god forbid), there would be 2 losses in the same family instead of one and if there were children involved........imagine the tragedy. My husband and I both are flight nurses for the same company and due to scheduling issues our crews may fly nurse/nurse occasionally. However, we do not work together on the same aircraft. We, along with management, both agree that it is definantly in our best interest not to fly together nor sign narcotics together. Most of these "guidelines" have been initiated by my husband and I due to the fact that it is not a common situation and we want to protect ourselves. You could see how a jury, or even a supervisor, could look at a husband/wife team who had a bad outcome with a patient and wonder if there were any issues that were not revealed because they were trying to protect each other. I can't say that I wouldn't think the same way in the their shoes. As I said before, this is not a written policy for our company, but I would definantly recommend that you not fly together for liability reasons. Fly safely! > > Serena Gramling > Native Air > > > > "Bob Johnson" <scoobymedic@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >A ? for the group, Does any flight services have any rules about spouses ( > >Nurse/medic )flying together as full time partners. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! > >http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Flightmed mailing list > >To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed > > > > > X ?zvf-)-+-N<r>zS.{*.sSVv > -m > ZSbsSYsYbا~-(!g
- From: "Slemp, Andrew A." <ASlemp@mc.utmck.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:01:40 -0500
I second Lisa's comment.-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Heinz [mailto:flytrn117@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:42 AM
To: flightmed@flightweb.com
Subject: Re: Scenarioyes, i have and i am not ashamed of giving credit where it is due!
Barbara Dunham <rotormed77@hotmail.com> wrote:
Okay, Here's a question for the group - how many of you have prayed during
treatment/transport of critically ill/injured patients? And if you have, do
you credit the prayer with making "the difference"?
(This is in reference to the comment that "Prayer would be useful too".)
Thanks in advance to any replies! Feel free to answer privately, if you
prefer.
Barb Dunham
rotormed77@hotmail.com
"Remote for detachment, narrow for chosen company, winding for leisure,
lonely for contemplation, the Trail leads not merely north and south, but
upward to the body, mind, and soul of man."
- Harold Allen, The Appalachian Trail Conference
_________________________________________________________________
Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband.
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
_______________________________________________
Flightmed mailing list
To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
- From: Ken Lawson-Williams <Macgyver@FlightMedicMail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:16:24 -0800 (PST)
None here, but at last program were several couples - two married. No rules, but the married couple worked adjacent shifts (d d n n x12) so as a family they still had 2 days off, and could cover childcare. Young crew, so many couples forming/reforming etc amongst ground/air/flight/dispatch crews. No problems occured, but dispatcher once sent husband into axe-murder scene ahead of police. Confusion over status of patient and scene, apparently... Fly Safe. Ken L-W CCEMT-P/WMT Duct tape is like the force, it has a light side and a dark side, and it holds the universe together. --- "Tom Waters" <tom@tomwaters.net> wrote: >Here at Wyoming Life Flight, we have 3 sets of husband/wife. 2 are >both-medic and 1 is medic/nurse. As with most, no written policies exist, >but couples do not fly or go ground for that matter, together. It is usually >only at shift change that the 2 medic teams are ever even seen together, as >there is kid-turnover and one parent goes home. I have worked several >places air and ground, and whether written or un, couples do not >supervise/work toghether, this includes when the pilot may be involved with >a medical crew member. That happens too, occasionally too. > >Good weekend all... >Tom Waters > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <sgram0529@cs.com> >To: <flightmed@flightweb.com> >Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:48 AM >Subject: RE: (no subject) > > >> Our company has an unwritten policy that doesn't allow family members to >fly on the same aircraft together due to the fact that if there were a crash >(god forbid), there would be 2 losses in the same family instead of one and >if there were children involved........imagine the tragedy. My husband and I >both are flight nurses for the same company and due to scheduling issues our >crews may fly nurse/nurse occasionally. However, we do not work together on >the same aircraft. We, along with management, both agree that it is >definantly in our best interest not to fly together nor sign narcotics >together. Most of these "guidelines" have been initiated by my husband and I >due to the fact that it is not a common situation and we want to protect >ourselves. You could see how a jury, or even a supervisor, could look at a >husband/wife team who had a bad outcome with a patient and wonder if there >were any issues that were not revealed because they were trying to protect >each other. I can't say that I wouldn't think the same way in the their >shoes. As I said before, this is not a written policy for our company, but I >would definantly recommend that you not fly together for liability reasons. >Fly safely! >> >> Serena Gramling >> Native Air >> >> >> >> "Bob Johnson" <scoobymedic@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >A ? for the group, Does any flight services have any rules about spouses >( >> >Nurse/medic )flying together as full time partners. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >_________________________________________________________________ >> >Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! >> >http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp >> > >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Flightmed mailing list >> >To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to >http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed >> > >> > >> X ?zvf-)-+-N<r>zS.{*.sSVv >> -m >> ZSbsSYsYbا~-(!g > > >_______________________________________________ >Flightmed mailing list >To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
- From: "Deb Milliner" <rotorhead@email.uophx.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 21:29:46 -0700
I have also said a prayer or two and have always known that a hand greater than mine made the real difference.
- From: "Deb Milliner" <rotorhead@email.uophx.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 21:31:15 -0700
We currently have no married couples in our program, but we do have a couple that are dating and practically live together (who doesn't?). We do not have specific rules, but at my last program, the couple had to sign a waiver to fly together. I don't know if this would hold up in a court of law, but it was a step. Deb Milliner Regional LifeFlight
- From: susan nittinger <suziqfly@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 18:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Barbara,
I am very happy to tell you I pray enroute to most of my transports!
Sue Toberman
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
why is it that some people get hired into flight services that have less experience and certs than others? Just wondering. And for those that are wondering...yes i was one that didnt get hired; probably opening up a can or worms I dont want to, just want opinions.
- From: Ted6016@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 01:59:42 EST
- From: Jeremy Hawk <akulahawk@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 01:29:32 -0800
At my service, (BLS ground, mostly) we generally TRY to keep people who are a couple off of the same unit. Mostly this is to reduce any chance of domestic problems arising in front of patients and also to reduce the chance of patient care differences from becoming a domestic issue. Actually, this has been the norm at every place I've worked, and in most cases, a written policy. Where there's a written policy, it's also standard to attempt to keep couples from being a supervisor to the other. Again, this reduces domestic problems. This, however, has rarely happened. No place where I've worked has had husband & wife in same company. Where we've had couples, we've rarely had problems when we have HAD to put them together, but this is NOT standard practice. Regardless, we absolutely require that they get along while in public or in front of clients (hospitals, patients, SNF's, families, etc.) and take any issues behind closed doors, out of sight, and leave it there once resolved. Seems to work, but this is my own experience with several small companies. Jeremy Hawk, EMT-P Stuck on the ground...
- From: Randy L'Heureux <medicwest@shaw.ca>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 20:16:25 -0800
Greetings from what is beginning to become the cold north.We are continuing (and will be for some time)to work on our scene flights and trauma systems. There is good information from the flight programs regarding their launch criteria for scene flights. The question that was brought up this morning regarded activation of the trauma team at the trauma center. When you are inbound with a patient is the trauma team activated based on physical findings, history or a combination of both. If it is physical findings it would be beneficial to know what your parameters are, such as BP, GCS etc. As usual any information is greatly appreciated.Fly safeRandy L'HeureuxAmbulance Paramedics of British Columbia
- From: "Robert Humphreys" <rdh33139@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 06:01:31 -0500
Just because someone has more certifications (initials behind their name) doesn't automatically make them the best candidate or qualify them over someone with fewer. As for "experience", depends on what type a person has, again more doesn't always mean better. Sometimes an employer would rather have someone with less experience so they can train them to fit into their system and it's much easier to do this with someone with little experience then a seasoned veteran. The other factors could be things like letters of reference, what ones application and or resume looked like when an employer reads them, how one presents themselves at the interview, dress, attitude, etc .... there could be any other number of things as well ...----- Original Message -----From: Ted6016@aol.comSent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 1:59 AMSubject: (no subject)why is it that some people get hired into flight services that have less experience and certs than others? Just wondering. And for those that are wondering...yes i was one that didnt get hired; probably opening up a can or worms I dont want to, just want opinions.
The trauma center here activates the trauma team on any pt. that is brought in by air. I have rarely seen them not activated.
- From: Ted6016@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:40:16 EST
- From: "Barbara Dunham" <rotormed77@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 09:31:39 -0600
If I could chime in my $.02 - at my program, we have a panel interview with the candidates (usually the on-duty crew members & mgt), and then the 2nd round is when the possibles are invited back for an interview with our Medical Director. At least for us, we tend to pick candidates that express viewpoints similar to the program mission, even though one may not have the most experience, he/she presents themselves better! No, it's not just the certifications! Barb "Remote for detachment, narrow for chosen company, winding for leisure, lonely for contemplation, the Trail leads not merely north and south, but upward to the body, mind, and soul of man." - Harold Allen, The Appalachian Trail Conference From: "Robert Humphreys" <rdh33139@bellsouth.net> Reply-To: flightmed@flightweb.com To: <flightmed@flightweb.com> Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 06:01:31 -0500 Just because someone has more certifications (initials behind their name) doesn't automatically make them the best candidate or qualify them over someone with fewer. As for "experience", depends on what type a person has, again more doesn't always mean better. Sometimes an employer would rather have someone with less experience so they can train them to fit into their system and it's much easier to do this with someone with little experience then a seasoned veteran. The other factors could be things like letters of reference, what ones application and or resume looked like when an employer reads them, how one presents themselves at the interview, dress, attitude, etc .... there could be any other number of things as well ... ----- Original Message ----- From: Ted6016@aol.com To: flightmed@flightweb.com Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 1:59 AM Subject: (no subject) why is it that some people get hired into flight services that have less experience and certs than others? Just wondering. And for those that are wondering...yes i was one that didnt get hired; probably opening up a can or worms I dont want to, just want opinions. _________________________________________________________________ Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
- From: "Jeff Brosius" <reno316@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 12:15:50 -0500
Slightly off topic, but it made me re-think my stand on religion: Once picked up a rather ill elderly female. Sepsis from long-term indwelling foley. Anyway, enroute, she held her hand out towards nothing. I asked her what she was reaching for... "His hand." "Who's hand, ma'am?" "Jesus." I got a little tense, partner drove a little faster, and we arrived at the ER. She died about three hours later. To the original post: Yes, and I don't care who knows it, either. ------------ JRB Jeff Brosius, Paramedic, etc. Atlanta, GA www.prehospital-perspective.com brosius@prehospital-perspective.com "Give me ambiguity or give me something else." >From: "Deb Milliner" <rotorhead@email.uophx.edu> >Reply-To: flightmed@flightweb.com >To: <flightmed@flightweb.com> >Subject: Re: Scenario >Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 21:29:46 -0700 > >I have also said a prayer or two and have always known that a hand greater >than mine made the real difference. >Deb Milliner >University of Phoenix >rotorhead@uophx.edu >debmilliner@hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________ Broadband?Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
- From: "Jeff Brosius" <reno316@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 12:20:55 -0500
For what it is worth (probably not much...) Grady Memorial Hosptial (Level 1 in Atlanta, GA) will activate on physiological or anatomical criteria (ACS COT criteria... e-mail me privately if you don't know them.) Rarely will they activate for mechanism alone if there are no associated physiol. or anatomic findings associated. Once in a while they will (i.e. pt. is known to have HTN, take B-Blocker, Ca++ Channel blocker, and VS are on the lower end of normal.) This, as mentioned, is rare. Then too, we've got 24h in-house surgical staff who can be in the ER in five minutes or less. At other hospitals, YMMV. ------------ JRB Jeff Brosius, Paramedic, etc. Atlanta, GA www.prehospital-perspective.com brosius@prehospital-perspective.com "Give me ambiguity or give me something else." >From: Randy L'Heureux <medicwest@shaw.ca> >Reply-To: flightmed@flightweb.com >To: flightmed@flightweb.com >Subject: Trauma team activation >Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 20:16:25 -0800 > >Greetings from what is beginning to become the cold north. >We are continuing (and will be for some time)to work on our scene flights >and trauma systems. There is good information from the flight programs >regarding their launch criteria for scene flights. The question that was >brought up this morning regarded activation of the trauma team at the >trauma center. When you are inbound with a patient is the trauma team >activated based on physical findings, history or a combination of both. If >it is physical findings it would be beneficial to know what your parameters >are, such as BP, GCS etc. As usual any information is greatly appreciated. >Fly safe >Randy L'Heureux >Ambulance Paramedics of British Columbia _________________________________________________________________ Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
- From: "Michael Getz" <flightmedicmike@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:02:22 -0700
To reply to Ted6016's remark of why programs may elect to hire certain candidates with fewer experience over himself, or less certification requirements there are perhaps many reasons, and being turned away the first or second time should not be entirely discouraging. In my own search and discussion with a few programs, I have found there are simply logistical considerations not readily apparent to applicants. If you are applying out of state, you may not get selected for issues arising out of relocation matters. A long distance interview can be financially burdening for the applicant to travel to, or for the program to offer the cost of. I am aware of some programs utilizing subjective psychological profiling during interviews and perhaps pervious flight experience is not as desirable for some programs as they may desire inexperience to better train a new employee without inheriting "bad habits". I would encourage anyone applying for flight positions to be patient, as it may take some time and repeat applications to land the job you hope to acquire.
Here at VCUHS, there is a two tier activation. Essentially, any problem with the primary survey (ABC or D) they get the highest alert, and any issues such as mechanism, co-morbid factors, or high potential injury patterns (i.e. 2 long bone fx's, etc.) get a reduced response. About the only difference between the two is that you get a Trauma Attending with the higher alert vs. a Chief or Sr. Resident, the rest of the team stays consistent. The triage nurse can make the call based on report, or when unsure will confer with ED Physician.
- From: DavidT8525@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 19:01:26 EST
David Trueman, RN
VCU LifeEvac
- From: KReninger@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 21:45:31 EST
- From: "Terry Foutch" <tfoutch@cookeville.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:32:06 -0600
Ted,I am a RN, Paramedic. Was a paramedic first with Nashville Fire Department for six years, went to nursing school. My nursing experience included manager of an ER/ICU. Staff nurse in ER, staff nurse in ICU, three years cath lab, and house supervisor. I am active in EMS education and hold instructor certs in PALS, ACLS, etc.I tell you this offer you some insight. I was recently hired as a flight nurse at Erlanger Life Force. I began applying in 1995, and counting the first four positions in 1995 when they opened a satellite base where I now work, have applied for 9 positions (every opening they have had since this base was opened). My only advice is this - be persistent. Prepare yourself, keep a good, positive attitude, and never give up on your goal. I believe it has also helped me to pray a lot.Consequently, I feel in some ways, my career as a flight nurse will be much more successful after waiting these seven years. I have had the opportunity to mature and gain experiences I would never have gained if I had been hired in 1995.Stay positive, and don't compromise. I know how you feel. Will be glad to discuss further if I can help.Terry Foutch, RN, EMTPErlanger Medical CenterLife Force Air Medical ServicesChattanooga, TN-----Original Message-----why is it that some people get hired into flight services that have less experience and certs than others? Just wondering. And for those that are wondering...yes i was one that didnt get hired; probably opening up a can or worms I dont want to, just want opinions.
From: flightmed-admin@flightweb.com [mailto:flightmed-admin@flightweb.com]On Behalf Of Ted6016@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 1:00 AM
To: flightmed@flightweb.com
Subject: (no subject)
- From: "David Pilkenton" <pilkenda@musc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 06:59:39 -0500
Great response Ted; the power of positive thinking.....................
- From: <mikeshuken@mail.value.net>
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Here's a good tip: Try calling the service that didn't hire you and ask why. Don't ask, "Why did you hire someone else" but say, "Is there a specific reason I didn't get hired?" Let them know you are interested in improving yourself in order to become a better qualified candidate. Ask them specifically what you would need to do to get hired next time. Talk to one of the managers themselves instead of one of the flight crew members - even if it was a flight crew member that interviewed you. There is no guarantee that they will hire you next time either, but I would bet that you will get some advice on ways to improve your desirability as a potential new hire. And like the last poster stated, try not to get discouraged - It's an extremely competitive job position (some people say for every one flight medic position there are 100 candidates). It often takes more than one or two interviews to get hired... Good luck, Mike Mike Shuken Paramedic AMR Oakland, Calif.
_______________________________________________ Flightmed mailing list