Flightmed archive for March-2002

Flightmed archive for March-2002
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transport time (school assignment)
Mr..Bulkley:
Thank You for answering my question. I a big supporter of Mercy Flight and
think the service is great. My data is unscientific in sense that I used
times from data collected from our computer at work form the past three
years. I did not collect data from Mercy flight so It will seem one sided. I
am not stating ground transport is better but each has it place. Next time
Mercy flight is in Lockport, I would love to talk with you. I'll buy the
coffee. Once again thanks for you time with this assignment.
Mark Seeloff
Student Nurse
Unversity of Buffalo
docmseeloff@hotmail.com
>From: Wildmedic75@cs.com
>Reply-To: flightmed@flightweb.com
>To: flightmed@flightweb.com
>Subject: Re: transport time (school assignment)
>Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:27:34 EST
>
><< Our ground time for transport was 30 minutes to the trauma
> center. The air transport time was 40 minutes. My department is ACLS,PALS
> and BTLS certified. My question is Should we wait the 10 minutes for the
>air
> transport or should we by pass the air transport for the faster time to
>the
> trauma center ? >>
>
>Mark,
>
>Hello there; my name is Allan Bulkley. I'm a full time flight medic at
>Mercy
>Flight of WNY.
>
>Thank you for asking these legitimate questions. In fact. the questions you
>raise (there are actually 2) are so interesting and valid that they are
>asked
>very often:
>
>1) Which method of transport truly is quicker; ground or air?
>2) Even if we have to wait a few extra minutes for the helicopter, will our
>patient still potentially benefit?
>
> First, I am curious...where you got your data? I can tell you with
>absolute certainty that any info you have saying that helicopter transport
>time from Lockport to ECMC is 40 minutes is flawed; from the LZ in Lockport
>to the rooftop at ECMC it is about 7 minutes by air; obviously a
>significant
>time savings over ground transport. I assume that the data you are looking
>at
>is comparing time of initial dispatch (when you guys call us) to the time
>we
>arrive at ECMC, vs the "ground data", which must look at the time you guys
>leave the scene to the time you get to ECMC. This really is apples and
>oranges.
>
> One thing that we stress when we do ground schools is to ALWAYS CALL
>US
>EARLY. This is the only way the system will work efficiently. If we are not
>called until you are at the scene, or worse yet, until after the patient is
>assessed and packaged, then there probably is little if any time savings in
>air transport, and the patient does not benefit from a shorter pre-hospital
>time.
>
> However, if we are put on an "airborne standby" as soon as you are
>dispatched to a call that meets criteria, then we can be arriving at the LZ
>at about the same time as (quite possibly before) you, and as long as the
>patient is already properly assessed and immobilized (a BIG source of
>wasted
>time for us is having to re-immobilize patients), and we DON'T have an
>airway
>problem or other critical intervention to perform, we will be off the
>ground
>headed to the county about 5 minutes after making patient contact - a net
>time savings of probably about 15 minutes.
>
> Does this make a difference in outcome? Who knows...it depends on many
>factors....but shouldn't we always err on the side of caution?
>
> As for the second question; "Does the patient benefit from air
>transport
>even if it is not quicker?"; I have to honestly say that I don't know. The
>research in this area is inconclusive.
>
> I can't make the "we can do more" argument because unfortunately, we
>don't operate under the same sort of expanded scope that many flight
>services
>do (not yet - that is hopefully changing soon), so with the exception of
>RSI
>for a patient who needs it, there's not alot we can do that you guys can't.
>
> However, intervention capabilities aside, consider the benefit of
>having
>care provided by two seasoned, well trained crew members (flight
>medic/flight
>nurse) who assess and manage serious trauma patients on a regular basis vs.
>having a lone paramedic (I assume that's your crew configuration) in the
>back
>of the ambulance with that patient. As a former full-time ground paramedic
>(still part-time) who is used to working alone with ALL TYPES of patients,
>I
>can personally attest that with a serious patient, it can make a
>significant
>difference in the quality of care provided enroute to the hospital.
>
> There's also the local resource factor....if you guys are out of
>service
>for 1.5 - 2 hours transporting a patient to ECMC, doing paperwork, cleaning
>your rig, and driving back to Lockport, who covers your city? I know you
>probably have more than one ambulance, but the resource issue still may be
>a
>factor to consider.
>
> In summary, I want to emphasize that as long as we are dispatched when
>we
>should be (at the same time as you guys for calls that meet criteria), then
>there is NO situation in which air transport is not SIGNIFICANTLY faster
>than
>ground transport from your location to the regional trauma center.
>
> Also, even if we aren't going to be significantly quicker, there may
>be
>other totally appropriate reasons to use us as well.
>
> I am interested in hearing more about your research, specifically
>where
>you collected your data and how it was compiled. Maybe I can help...we've
>got
>lots of retrospective data on file in our communications center. I'd also
>like to talk more about the practical aspect of your utilization of
>us....in
>other words, how can we make it easier for you to use us, and how can we
>work
>together to make the system smoother and more efficient? Please respond
>privately.....
>
>Thanks,
>
>Allan Bulkley
>Flight Paramedic
>Mercy Flight of WNY
>
>_______________________________________________
>Flightmed mailing list
>To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to
>http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
>
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
_______________________________________________
Flightmed mailing list
To unsubscribe or change your email address, go to http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/flightmed
[ Home |
Archive |
Classifieds |
Links |
Resources |
White Pages ]

© 2000 -- Website created by
Rollie Parrish |
Credits |
Last modified: 03/28/02