Flightmed archive for March-2002

Flightmed archive for March-2002
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: on-scene vs. aircraft intubations
I say a hearty AMEN to that. I have been flying for 13 years and I
have yet to see any two flights the same. The variables are too many to
count, and we need to be alert, flexible, safe, aggressive and efficient provide
the best possible care for the patient. To do less is negligence from many
angles. If I am injured/ill, my life is in the hands of the person beside
me - not in the hands of the medical director/management back home in
the easy chair of the office or home.
Jo Pufahl, SMDC LifeFlight, Duluth, MN
Hi all,
I have read with interest all the discussion that this
topic has generated. David and I have discussed this dilemma at length
in the past. I think there are several key elements: patient's
current airway management (or lack of), clinician's judgement of the
situation, and safety of the flight crew. As we all know, it is nearly
impossible to plug our "gray" patients into a "black and white" system.
All patients and scenarios will differ and we must use our clinical
assessment skills and judgement to make the best decision possible for the
best patient outcome.
If the patient is maintaining an adequate
airway and can be safely packaged and transported to the helicopter, then a
tube should be placed in flight. However, I recently did a scene
response involving a teenage male, head-injured from a roll-over.
He was in the back of the local EMS ambulance, c-collar, LBB, one IV line
in place, saturations were 67% on a NRB. GCS of 6. Spontaneous
respirations but gurgling from all the blood in his oropharynx, moaning on
expiration, bilateral pupils blown. I opted to stay and RSI on scene.
My partner and I identified the patient as being hypoxic with poor
airway control. To have delayed tube placement for an additional 5 to 7
minutes would have been, in my opinion, not in this patient's best interest
and legally negligent on my part. I understand that many feel legal
issues should not necessarily determine the clinician's course of action.
However, the patient's medical chart is no longer just a "medical chart"
but a "medicolegal" chart. Our decisions, actions, and documentation often
come under the legal microscope. What would I have done if not able to
tube? Combitube and scoot. It does you and your patient very
little! good to arrive at the trauma center in record time with a dead patient
from lack of airway management.
In our industry there is a lot
of pressure placed upon us to deliver fast, expediate care. Some of that
pressure stems from competing airmedical services. "if they can do
on-scene times of < 10" so can you." We need to resist those
pressures and focus on what is best for our patients and the safety of our
crew.
Thanks for lending an ear.......
Janet
Flight
Nurse
[ Home |
Archive |
Classifieds |
Links |
Resources |
White Pages ]

© 2000 -- Website created by
Rollie Parrish |
Credits |
Last modified: 03/09/02