Flightmed archive for February-2002
FlightWeb Links
----------------------
Flightmed archive for February-2002



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Endotracheal Intubation Success Rates



Hi;
    I think I can give you some help.  As Medical Director of both Flight for Life (rotorwing) program in Colorado Springs and AMR(ground based ambulance with paramedics) in Colorado Springs - I can gove you numbers form both agencies, since both do RSI.
    Over thje past three years Flight for Life (FFL) has a 100% success rate acheiving a tracheal intubation with RSI.  This is almost always in the first attempt.  I can recall two or three times when intubation has required more than one but less than three attempts.  I am not counting the total number of attempts in the 100% figure.  To me, if the airway is acheived in three attempts or less, that is a 100% success rate.  We fly about 400 patients a year and probably 30 % of these patients are RSi'd.
    On our ground based paramedic ambulance, we have utilized RSI of one year.  At this point, we have attempted 58 RSIs with a 94% success rate.  Again the same definition regarding successful airway placement described above applies here.  AMR Colorado Springs transports about 300 critical airway patients per year, out of a total number of 30,000 transports per year.
    By the way, cricothyrotomy is not viewed as a bailout airway option in wither agency if RSI fails.  We use BVM and/or the Combitube or LMA Fastrach as alternate airways.  So far, we have only had to go to a cric once in in the past five years in an RSI patient that could not be intubated at FFL.  We have not needed to go to a cric at all at AMR.  The key to success for RSI is proper patient selection.
    Hope this helps.  Let me know if you need more info.
Dave Ross

[ Home | Archive | Classifieds | Links | Resources | White Pages ]
line picture
© 2000 -- Website created by Rollie Parrish | Credits | Last modified: 02/09/02