Flightmed archive for June-2001

Flightmed archive for June-2001
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Physician-Staffed Helicopters
- From: "Paul M. Wright, Jr." <pmwright@home.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:11:57 -0700
>>That would be myself,
>>as an RN making a diagnoses based on "my
field experience". I would love to
>>be that patients lawyer.
I have
to kind of chuckle whenever I read that kind of statement because it usually
means all the really good arguments have been used up. The legal reality
is that lawsuits are based on bad outcomes and the liability generally falls to
those shown to have acted unreasonably with regards to the standard of
care. In my experience, credibility weighs much more heavily than
credentials in those cases but regardless, patient care should be rendered for
best possible outcome and not because of a hypothetical future
lawsuit.
In the
real world, flight nurses can and do make changes in the care plan that are
often somewhat at odds with the direction established by the referring
physician. When those changes are made within an accepted system of
medical control, the liability is not significantly different than when a
physician is present as a member of the flight team. Your statement
implies otherwise, but I doubt you can back it up with either case law or
anecdote that demonstrates the difference.
>>As far as the Australian study, you are right,
there has been no study in
>>North America or Canada (and I am
not sure why?...anybody know?)
I can
venture a guess that it's because there is severe competition for resources to
study things that matter and this particular issue doesn't. If a program
can support the cost of physician staffing and if there is determined to be a
marketable competitive edge to it, the clinical efficacy doesn't matter - you
either accept it or you don't and a study is not going to sway anyone's
opinion. Looking at it from the perspective of a program that offers
physician staffing and uses it as a differentiator in the market, do you really
want to commit resources to a study that will, in all likelihood, fail to
convince anyone of the value of what you're doing unless they are already a true
believer?
On the
other hand, for the vast majority of air medical programs for which the cost or
logistics would be prohibitive, it really doesn't make sense to commit to study
something you can't afford anyway.
regards!
paul
Paul
M. Wright, Jr.
Mesa,
AZ
[ Home |
Archive |
Classifieds |
Links |
Resources |
White Pages ]

© 2000 -- Website created by
Rollie Parrish |
Credits |
Last modified: 06/26/01